| |
Statement of Purpose
By George Brewer
Editor-in-Chief
In one of his essays George Orwell described
in acute detail the spiritual death of those among his peers who
subordinated their minds to the changeable and heavy-handed dictates
of the Communist International under Josef Stalin. Orwell understood
that without freedom, creativity dies. Men and women may be able
to say and do any number of things, but when they find out there
are certain things that they can't discuss, can't investigate, and
can't use as fuel for their creative urges, the full range of their
creativity starts to dry up, as surely as our eastern states have
withered without rain.
In Orwell's time, it meant the inability to speak freely about Nazism,
the Nazi-Soviet pact of 1939, or even about the inspiration for
1984's Emanuel Goldstein, Leon Trotsky. In our day,
it means we are unable to speak freely about the Holocaust: unable
to say what it really was, unable to question what significance
it really has. We understand the critics who say that we should
just let go, and go with the crowd. Political correctness is, we
are told, just a nasty name cooked up by conservatives to mask their
own intolerance and lack of compassion. Unfortunately, once one
becomes aware of the dark corners, the curtains that mustn't be
looked behind, the soul won't rest. Dostoevsky understood it well;
build a Crystal Palace, call it the last word of civilization, and
someone will throw a brick at it, just on principle. He also understood
that no matter how healthy the rest of the body, it was the one
aching tooth that would attract all the attention, that would inevitably
be poked and prodded.
Of all of the sacred cows, the eternal verities, what Veblen used to
call the "vendible imponderables of the nth dimension," the Holocaust
bulks largest. It is the Crystal Palace of our intellectual life,
the lingering toothache of our culture. Yet it is also untouchable;
to touch upon it at all, without following the herd, is punishable
with prison in some Western countries, and there is a movement to
make it a crime in our own.
The purpose of The Revisionist, for as long as it may
wave, is simply to be the brick that smashes through the crystal
palace of the complacency, irrationality, and hypocrisy that has
reduced our national intellectual life to little more than the rote
maneuvers of linemen at a poultry processing plant. It is to be
that finger which prods and pokes the pain, because here at least
the poking and prodding is honest and liberating, and doesn't skulk
around in the garb of postmodernist lingo or in self-promoting drag.
We will emphasize the Holocaust, and the gas chamber legend, as the
means of defending intellectual freedom, though these will not be
the only themes we shall engage. Whether we will be able to successfully
skeet the other clay feet of the hegemonic ideology of liberal Secular
Humanism depends on how well we defend the right to think differently
about the Jewish catastrophe, as much as anything else. You focus
on the hardest part, and the rest comes easy. Easy like the rain.
|
|