Frank Stiffel – Super Survivor or Simple Fraud?by Thomas Kues
Frank Stiffel is not a very well-known “Holocaust survivor”. His testimony is rarely referred to by orthodox Holocaust historians, if at all. Still, his memoirs are of interest to those researching the alleged mass extermination of Jews during World War II. First, because Mr. Stiffel claims to have survived Treblinka as well as Auschwitz. Second, because his description of life in Auschwitz gives insight into the rumor mongering prevalent in the camps. Third, because Stiffel is a prime example of a camp survivor awkwardly trying to retrofit his memories to the orthodox Holocaust narrative. Frank Stiffel is a Polish Jew born in 1915. After the war, Stiffel together with his wife emigrated to the United States, where he settled in Flushing, New York. In 1984, his memoirs, entitled The Tale of the Ring: A Kaddish, was published by Pushcart Press. A paperback edition of the book was made available in 1994. According to its preface, as well an article which appeared in the New York Times in November 1994, Stiffel began writing about his Holocaust experience already at Treblinka in 1942. In the same article article, we are told that Stiffel “wrote on remnants of soap, on pieces of clothing that had been stripped from prisoners destined to be gassed and on the occasional scrap of paper that he bartered from the black market in the camp.”[1] In 1983, the manuscript of The Tale of the Ring was selected for the second annual Editors’ Book Award.
Stiffel’s sojourn to Treblinka Stiffel claims to have spent six days in the “death camp” Treblinka – from September 4 to September 9, 1942 – before managing to escape accompanied by his brother Martin.[2] The brothers were deported to Treblinka together with their parents, as well as Martin’s wife. At arrival, Frank saw his parents and his brother’s wife led away, supposedly to the camp’s alleged homicidal gas chambers. In the following passage, he describes what he observed from the closed-in yard were newly arrived deportees were gathered:
A bit later, he writes that the water in Treblinka had
One might perhaps argue that some kind “nauseating sweetish smell” might emanate from decomposing corpses, but obviously Stiffel is talking about the smell of burning corpses here – thus the “smell of burnt skin” sticking to everything in the camp. However, orthodox historiography has it that the first cremations in Treblinka – conducted outdoors on huge pyres, since no crematory ovens were ever installed at the site – took place in late March or early April 1943 – more than half a year after Stiffel’s escape.[5] Only one witness, Richard Glazar, talks of cremations in 1942, and he claims that they begun in November that year, a whole two months after Stiffel left the camp.[6] The fantastical nature of Stiffel’s Treblinka account is further demonstrated by the following baroque and slightly lewd passage:
Cremation of humans bodies supposedly took place at two separate locations within the perimeters of Treblinka II camp. First, there were allegedly the pyres inside the camp’s enclosed “extermination area” or “upper camp”. At those pyres, consisting of railway gauge placed in parallel on top of concrete fundaments, the victims of the alleged gas chambers were incinerated, their ashes later being put back in the opened mass graves. But as has already been mentioned, the cremations inside the “extermination area” supposedly began several months after Stiffel’s escape from Treblinka. There is no mention of the grill-like pyres in Stiffel’s account and there is also no reason why the Germans would have shot people in the proximity of those (alleged) pyres. The other site where cremations were supposedly carried out was the so-called Lazarett (German for hospital). At the Lazarett, those arrivals who were too old or sick to walk to the gas chambers were shot into a pit where an “eternal flame” consumed their bodies. This sounds more like the scenario described by Stiffel, but there are two grave problems with his account. First, there is no reason why a young girl able to walk would not be sent to the gas chambers instead. Second, the scenery and location described by Stiffel is inconsistent with those given by other witnesses. According to Israeli Holocaust historian Yitzhak Arad, the Lazarett was disguised as a primitive field hospital, red cross flag and all. The victims had to sit down in a small hut, awaiting their turn to be “called in by the doctor”, which meant that they were taken to the edge of the burning pit, forced to sit down at its edge and shot in the back of the head.[8] The inside of the fake Lazarett was hidden on three sides by a tall fence and on the fourth by a huge rampart of soil and sand resulting from the digging of mass graves in the adjacent extermination area. In the words of Richard Glazar:
There were no trees in the proximity of the Lazarett, no less a row of firs. What’s even more compromising to Stiffel – the Lazarett was not built until October 1942, according to orthodox historiography. Before that date, there only existed a few mass graves in the area. No pyres or burning pits.[10] Stiffel’s story about burning ditches is therefore either fantasy, or a repetition of rumors told in first person. Stiffel also mentions rumors as such:
Interestingly, it was claimed by “Nazi-hunter” Simon Wiesenthal in 1946 that Belzec, another of the three Reinhardt camps, contained a “soap factory”.[12]
In the end, Stiffel and his brother supposedly managed to escape from Treblinka by hiding on a train, helped in this risky endeavor by the voice of a girl depicted on a mysterious ring which Frank found while sorting rags in a Treblinka barrack. I don’t wish to spoil the rest of this sentimental yarn for the presumptive reader. It will suffice to say that the Tale of the Ring is no Lord of the Rings when it comes to plot, description or language. Maybe in all fairness this should be blamed not on the author, but rather on the poor war time quality of the soap on which the first draft was written?
Stiffel in Auschwitz Stammlager After escaping from Treblinka, Stiffel tries to evade the German occupiers but is soon caught again and sent to Auschwitz Stammlager. Stiffel does not provide any date for the transport, but from the narrative we gather that it occurred sometime during the autumn of 1942. After spending about a month in Stammlager, Stiffel is transferred to a small subcamp called Kobier. Here he works for about approximately 8-9 months as a lumberjack and later as a medic, before being returned to Auschwitz Stammlager, where he comes to work as a medic (Pleger) in Krankenbau Block 28. On one occasion, we are told, Stiffel makes an errand to the former old crematorium (Krema I):
To begin with, the old crematorium is nowhere near the railroad platform. There never existed a platform inside the perimeter of Stammlager. Instead, new arrivals to the camp deboarded their trains at a provisory platform beside a railway spur running in SSE direction past the southwest corner of Stammlager. The crematorium, on the other hand, is located in the north corner of the camp, some dozen meters outside the fenced-in area. It simply makes no sense that Stiffel and the other men would roll the chlorine barrels from one end of the camp to another, a distance of approximately 400 meters. It is of note here that “Herman of the Leichenkommando” calls the building a “show case theater”, a name which makes no sense applied to a former crematorium. However, the actual Auschwitz theater building is located just south of the camp fence, and not far from the railway spur. To assess the description of the inside of the old crematorium we have to establish the date of Stiffel’s alleged visit to the building. On page 238 we are told that it is the “noon of Rosh Hashana 1943”. This holiday falls in either September or October. In 1943 it fell on September 30 and October 1. From page 238 to page 248, where the visit is described, approximately two days passes, which means that we are still in the beginning of October 1943. Crematorium I functioned as a crematorium installation up till July 17, 1943.[14] On November 16, 1943, the commandant of Auschwitz Stammlager, SS-Obersturmbannführer Arthur Liebehenschel, issued an order regarding “Air-raid measures at garrison Auschwitz”, and on July 16 the following year SS-Obergruppenführer Pohl approved the installation of an air-raid shelter (“Luftschutzbunker”) in the former crematorium. The conversion of the morgue, washing room and surgery/laying-out room of Krema I into an air-raid shelter commenced in mid-October and was finished in the second half of November 1944.[15] It is not well known how the old crematorium building was utilized – if at all – between July 1943 and October 1944.[16] That it may have been temporarily used for storage purposes is not unthinkable. Anyway, it is certain that the interior structure of Krema I at the time Stiffel allegedly visited it was identical to that found on the final blueprints to the building from 1940. Stiffel describes how he entered the building “through a heavy sliding door that separated a kind of an antechamber from the large, low-ceilinged room in which the barrels were stocked”. There indeed exists an antechamber leading into the “reconstructed” “gas chamber” of today’s Krema I, however, this antechamber or vestibule is not original to the building, but was constructed at the same time as the conversion of the morgue and adjacent rooms into an air-raid shelter, to serve as an air lock.[17] Up until October 1944, the morgue (=the alleged gas chamber) could only be reached from the furnace room or the washing room.[18] The possible objection that Stiffel may have been mistaken about dates, and that he actually visited the building after November 1944 is not valid, since after stepping through the tiny vestibule he would have found himself not in a “large, low-ceilinged room” but in a small room measuring roughly 10 square meters, in turn leading into another small room.[19] When the Poles “reconstructed” the air-raid shelter into the alleged “gas chamber” that is to be seen at the site today, they retained the air lock and passed it off as a vestibule to the “gas chamber”. However, if one reads the testimony of alleged former “Sonderkommando” member Alter Feinsilberg (alias Stanislaw Jankowski), who claims to have witnessed gassings in the morgue, the number of doors leading into the room is given as two, "one in the side wall [i.e. the door leading to the furnace room], the other in the end wall [opening to the washing room]".[20] If the small vestibule had existed, there would have been three doors. According to the account of former Auschwitz commandant Rudolf Höss, the victims of the Krema I gas chamber undressed in "the vestibule", which could only signify the vestibule of the main entrance, measuring approximately 30 square meters.[21] The notion of several hundreds of victims taking turns undressing in an antechamber measuring 2x2 meters is simply not plausible. Thus the notion of a small vestibule existing prior to October 1944 lacks a basis even in eyewitness testimony. Stiffel’s description of the crematory urns is incorrect (not to mention that there was no vestibule and no niche in which to place them). The urns used at the old crematorium were made of metal, but they were not shaped as metal cans for preserved meat. At the bottom they tapered off, so that the urns’ shape was somewhat reminiscent of a short pistol bullet balanced on its (flattened) head. This peculiar shape would make it difficult to arrange a number of such urns in a pyramid, as described by the witness. Furthermore, a Crematorium I urn did not carry any cross (or similar symbol), but instead a small white label on its lower half, stating a certificate number, the full name of the deceased, the date of birth, the date of death and the date of cremation.[22] The urns at Krema I were stored in a small separate room, located between the morgue and the coke storage and enterable from the furnace room.[23] It is thus unlikely that Stiffel would encounter remaining cremation urns anywhere else in the building. It is possible that the story about the chlorine barrel errand was not made up of thin air after all. Josef Odi, a former prisoner and member of a delousing commando reports how he brought used Zyklon B cans to the theatre building to be sent back to the manufacturer, as well as picked up unused cans there for use in the delousing installation.[24] One would assume that where one article used for delousing/disinfection was stored, others of the same kind might also be stored. This would indicate the possibility that Stiffel indeed unloaded chlorine barrels and placed them in a store, but that this store was located in the nearby theater building and not in the old crematorium. The pyramid of urns may even have been inspired by a sight of Zyklon B cans (perhaps used ones without labels), which are far more similar in shape to preserved food cans than the real urns, and fully possible to arrange in pyramids. The memory of that sighting might later have been transformed under the influence of hearsay. The Rumours of Auschwitz In his description of camp life in Auschwitz, Stiffel recounts many astounding tidbits. The following quote will suffice to illustrate their reliability:
Stiffel does not specify whether he heard those alleged words of the commandant himself, or as recounted by other prisoners. However, it does not require much intelligence to realize that no camp authority, however arrogant – and given that the claim about the prison diet was in fact true – would never address prisoners in such a way, or he would potentially have triggered an uprising. Besides, with a diet “scientifically calculated” to induce mass starvation in the camp, why even bother with installing homicidal gas chambers? After all, several millions of captured soldiers from both sides of the conflict died due to malnutrition, epidemics and general mistreatment in POW camps during and after the war. This killing method would have been both simpler and considerably cheaper than the gas chambers championed by orthodox historians. The most bizarre camp rumor dished up by Mr. Stiffel must surely be the following one:
How human beings could be gassed to death in disinfection gas chamber that lacked any possibility of introducing Zyklon B into them except for placing the carrier material on the floor, as done during disinfection of clothes and other materials, remains an impenetrable question.[27] It seems likewise implausible that “Sonderkommando” veterans would allow themselves to be put inside a gas chamber without offering any resistance. “Sonderkommando eyewitness Henryk Tauber recounts the same story about “Sonderkommando” members killed in delousing chambers in his deposition dating from May 24, 1945.[28] Since the Tauber testimony was not widely available until published by Pressac in 1989, five years after the publication of Stiffel’s memoirs, this indicates that we are looking at an original Auschwitz rumor.[29] Pressac himself considers the story “dubious”, “unlikely”, and unproven.[30]
Stiffel and the Amazing Disappearing Kula Column The perhaps most interesting part of Stiffel’s Auschwitz account appears at the very end. After staying in Stammlager until the liberation by the Red Army on January 27, 1945, Stiffel together with “Gordon” (identifiable as Jackov Gordon, a Lithuanian-Jewish doctor in the camp who is mentioned in the Soviet Auschwitz Report) gave Soviet officers and reporters a guided tour to the (alleged) former murder sites at Auschwitz Stammlager and Auschwitz-Birkenau:
The following passage is also worth quoting in extensio.
No need here to consider Dr. Gordon’s miraculously detailed knowledge of the supposed gassing process (complete with the bizarre notion of the air in the gas chamber being sucked out through vents – something which, if possible, would have rendered the use of poison gas meaningless in the first place)[32] – the report of a complete remaining “Kula column” in the ruins of Krema II (or possibly III) is no less than sensational! How come this remarkable find was never documented by the Soviet or Polish investigating committees? And why was it not preserved? What reason could the liberators of the camp have had to destroy crucial material evidence relating to the barbarous Hitlerite mass gassings of millions of innocent Jewish martyrs at Auschwitz? No more needs to be said concerning the reliability of Mr. Stiffel’s writings.
ENDNOTES
[1] “The Tale of the Ring: A Kaddish”, New York Times, November 20, 1994, Section 13LI, p. 10. [2] Cf. Stiffel, p.86, about the ring he supposedly found in the camp: "Some day, I'm going to have it engraved with 'Treblinka - September 4 through 9'". [3] Stiffel, p.75-76. [4] Stiffel, p.77. [5] Cf Yitzhak Arad, Belzec, Sobibor, Treblinka. The Operation Reinhard Death Camps, Indiana University Press 1987, p. 177. [6] R. Glazar, Trap with a green fence, Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL, 1995, p.29. [7] Stiffel, p.81. [8] Arad, p. 122. [9] Claude Lanzmann, Shoah. The Complete Text of the Acclaimed Holocaust Film, Da Capo Press, New York 1995, p.111. [10] Arad, p.121-122. [11] Stiffel, p.77. [12] S. Wiesenthal, “Seifenfabrik Belsetz”, Der Neue Weg, No. 19/20, Vienna 1946, p. 14. [13] Stiffel, p.248-9. [14] Carlo Mattogno, Auschwitz: Crematorium I and the Alleged Homicidal Gassings, Theses & Dissertations Press, Chicago 2005, p. 22. [15] Ibid, p. 22-23. [16] According to former prisoner Hermann Langbein the former furnace room was utilized as a medical storage during the time period of the air-raid shelter. Cf. Jean-Claude Pressac, Auschwitz: Technique and Operation of the Gas Chambers, The Beate Klarsfeld Foundation, New York 1989, p. 133. [17] Mattogno, Auschwitz: Crematorium I, p. 89. [18] Ibid, p. 103. [19] Ibid, p. 106. [20] Pressac, p. 124. [21] Cf. Mattogno, p. 52.. [22] Pressac, p. 133. [23] Germar Rudolf, The Rudolf Report. Expert Report on Chemical and Technical Aspects of the 'Gas Chambers' of Auschwitz, Theses & Dissertations Press, Chicago 2003, p. 80. [24] Pressac, p. 41. [25] Stiffel, p.184. [26] Stiffel, p.275-6. [27] For a description of how the delousing operations utilizing Zyklon B were carried out at “Kanada”, see Pressac, p.41. [28] Ibid, p. 498. [29] My words “widely available” here are of course debatable, considering the highly limited printing and sales of Pressac’s volume. [30] Ibid, p. 498. [31] Stiffel, p.309. [32] Not to mention that Gordon gives the number of Birkenau gas chambers as five and places them on the same spot. |
|
Committee for Open Debate on the
Holocaust, Bradley R. Smith, Director - Post Office Box 439016,
San Ysidro, CA 92143 |