|
INSTITUTE
FOR HISTORICAL REVIEW |
LEAFLETS
|
|
A Prominent False Witness:
Elie Wiesel
By Robert Faurisson
ELIE WIESEL won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1986. He is generally accepted
as a witness to the Jewish "Holocaust," and, more specifically, as a
witness to the legendary Nazi extermination gas chambers. The Paris
daily Le Monde emphasized at the time that Wiesel was awarded
the Nobel Prize because: (note 1)
These last years have seen, in the name of so-called "historical
revisionism," the elaboration of theses, especially in France, questioning
the existence of the Nazi gas chambers and, perhaps beyond that,
of the genocide of the Jews itself.
But in what respect is Elie Wiesel a witness to the alleged gas chambers?
By what right does he ask us to believe in that means of extermination?
In an autobiographical book that supposedly describes his experiences
at Auschwitz and Buchenwald, he nowhere mentions the gas chambers. (note
2) He does indeed say that the Germans executed Jews, but ... by
fire; by throwing them alive into flaming ditches, before the very eyes
of the deportees! No less than that!
Here Wiesel the false witness had some bad luck. Forced to choose from among
several Allied war propaganda lies, he chose to defend the fire lie
instead of the boiling water, gassing, or electrocution lies. In 1956,
when he published his testimony in Yiddish, the fire lie was still alive
in certain circles. This lie is the origin of the term Holocaust. Today
there is no longer a single historian who believes that Jews were burned
alive. The myths of the boiling water and of electrocution have also
disappeared. Only the gas remains.
The gassing lie was spread by the Americans. (note 3) The
lie that Jews were killed by boiling water or steam (specifically at
Treblinka) was spread by the Poles. (note 4) The electrocution
lie was spread by the Soviets.n (note 5)
The fire lie is of undetermined origin. It is in a sense as old as war propaganda
or hate propaganda. In his memoir, Night, which is a version of his
earlier Yiddish testimony, Wiesel reports that at Auschwitz there was
one flaming ditch for the adults and another one for babies. He writes:
(note 6)
Not far from us, flames were leaping from a ditch, gigantic flames.
They were burning something. A lorry drew up at the pit and delivered
its load -- little children. Babies! Yes, I saw it -- saw it with
my own eyes ... Those children in the flames. (Is it surprising
that I could not sleep after that? Sleep has fled from my eyes.)
A little farther on there was another ditch with gigantic flames where
the victims suffered "slow agony in the flames." Wiesel's column was
led by the Germans to within "three steps" of the ditch, then to "two
steps." "Two steps from the pit we were ordered to turn to the left
and made to go into a barracks."
An exceptional witness himself, Wiesel assures us of his having met other
exceptional witnesses. Regarding Babi Yar, a place in Ukraine where
the Germans executed Soviet citizens, among them Jews, Wiesel wrote:
(note 7)
Later, I learn from a witness that, for month after month, the ground
never stopped trembling; and that, from time to time, geysers of
blood spurted from it.
These words did not slip from their author in a moment of frenzy: first,
he wrote them, then some unspecified number of times (but at least once)
he had to reread them in the proofs; finally, his words were translated
into various languages, as is everything this author writes.
That Wiesel personally survived, was, of course, the result of a miracle.
He says that: (note 8)
In Buchenwald they sent 10,000 persons to their deaths each day.
I was always in the last hundred near the gate. They stopped. Why?
In 1954 French scholar Germaine Tillion analyzed the "gratuitous lie"
with regard to the German concentration camps. She wrote: (note
9)
Those persons [who gratuitously lie] are, to tell the truth, much
more numerous than people generally suppose, and a subject like
that of the concentration camp world -- well designed, alas, to
stimulate sado-masochistic imaginings -- offered them an exceptional
field of action. We have known numerous mentally damaged persons,
half swindlers and half fools, who exploited an imaginary deportation;
we have known others of them -- authentic deportees -- whose sick
minds strove to go even beyond the monstrosities that they had seen
or that people said had happened to them. There have been publishers
to print some of their imaginings, and more or less official compilations
to use them, but publishers and compilers are absolutely inexcusable,
since the most elementary inquiry would have been enough to reveal
the imposture.
Tillion lacked the courage to give examples and names. But that is usually
the case. People agree that there are false gas chambers that tourists
and pilgrims are encouraged to visit, but they do not tell us where.
They agree that there are false "eyewitnesses," but in general they
name only Martin Gray, the well-known swindler, at whose request Max
Gallo, with full knowledge of what he was doing, fabricated the bestseller
For Those I Loved.
Jean-François Steiner is sometimes named as well. His bestselling novel Treblinka
(1966) was presented as a work of which the accuracy of every detail
was guaranteed by oral or written testimony. In reality it was a fabrication
attributable, at least in part, to the novelist Gilles Perrault. (note
10) Marek Halter, for his part, published his La Mémoire d'Abraham
in 1983; as he often does on radio, he talked there about his experiences
in the Warsaw ghetto. However, if we are to believe an article by Nicolas
Beau that is quite favorable to Halter, (note 11)
little Marek, about three years old, and his mother left Warsaw not
in 1941 but in October of 1939, before the establishment of the ghetto
there by the Germans. Halter's book is supposed to have been actually
written by a ghost writer, Jean-Noël Gurgan.
Filip Müller is the author of Eyewitness Auschwitz: Three Years in
the Gas Chambers, (note 12) which won the 1980
prize of the International League against Racism and Anti-Semitism (LICRA).
This nauseous best-seller is actually the work of a German ghost writer,
Helmut Freitag, who did not hesitate to engage in plagiarism. (note
13) The source of the plagiarism is Auschwitz: A Doctor's
Eyewitness Account, another best-seller made up out of whole
cloth and attributed to Miklos Nyiszli. (note 14)
Thus a whole series of works presented as authentic documents turns out to
be merely compilations attributable to various ghost writers: Max Gallo,
Gilles Perrault, Jean-Noël Gurgan (?), and Helmut Freitag, among others.
We would like to know what Germaine Tillion thinks about Elie Wiesel today.
With him the lie is certainly not gratuitous. Wiesel claims to be full
of love for humanity. However, he does not refrain from an appeal to
hatred. In his opinion: (note 15)
Every Jew, somewhere in his being, should set apart a zone of hate
-- healthy, virile hate -- for what the German personifies and for
what persists in the German. To do otherwise would be a betrayal
of the dead.
At the beginning of 1986, 83 deputies of the German Bundestag took the
initiative of proposing Wiesel for the Nobel Peace Prize. This would
be, they said, "a great encouragement to all who are active in the process
of reconciliation." (note 16) That is what might be
called "going from National Socialism to national masochism."
Jimmy Carter needed a historian to preside over the President's Commission
on the Holocaust. As Dr. Arthur Butz said so well, he chose not a historian
but a "histrion": Elie Wiesel. Even the newspaper Le Monde, in the article
mentioned above, was obliged to refer to the histrionic trait that certain
persons deplore in Wiesel:
Naturally, even among those who approve of the struggle of this
American Jewish writer, who was discovered by the Catholic François
Mauriac, some reproach him for having too much of a tendency to
change the Jewish sadness into "morbidity" or to become the high
priest of a "planned management of the Holocaust."
As Jewish writer Leon A. Jick has written: "The devastating barb, 'There
is no business like SHOAH-business' is, sad to say, a recognizable truth."
(note 17)
Elie Wiesel issues alarmed and inflammatory appeals against Revisionist authors.
He senses that things are getting out of hand. It is going to become
more and more difficult for him to maintain the mad belief that the
Jews were exterminated or were subjected to a policy of extermination,
especially in so-called gas chambers. Serge Klarsfeld has admitted that
real proofs of the existence of the gas chambers have still not yet
been published. He promises proofs. (note 18)
On the scholarly plane, the gas chamber myth is finished. To tell the truth,
that myth breathed its last breath several years ago at the Sorbonne
colloquium in Paris (June 29-July 2, 1982), at which Raymond Aron and
François Furet presided. What remains is to make this news known to
the general public. However, for Elie Wiesel it is of the highest importance
to conceal that news. Thus all the fuss in the media, which is going
to increase: the more the journalists talk, the more the historians
keep quiet.
But there are historians who dare to raise their voices against the lies
and the hatred. That is the case with Michel de Boüard, wartime member
of the Resistance, deportee to Mauthausen, member of the Committee for
the History of the Second World War from 1945 to 1981, and a member
of the Institut de France. In a poignant interview in 1986, he courageously
acknowledged that in 1954 he had vouched for the existence of a gas
chamber at Mauthausen where, it finally turns out, there never was one.
(note 19)
The respect owed to the sufferings of all the victims of the Second World
War, and, in particular, to the sufferings of the deportees, demands
on the part of historians a return to the proven and time-honored methods
of historical criticism.
Notes
- October 17, 1986. Front page.
- There is one single allusion, extremely vague
and fleeting, on pages 78-79: Wiesel, who very much likes to have
conversations with God, says to Him: "But these men here, whom You
have betrayed, whom You have allowed to be tortured, butchered,
gassed, burned, what do they do? They pray before you!" (Night,
New York, Discus/Avon Books, 1969, p. 79). In his preface to that
same book, François Mauriac mentioned "the gas chamber and the crematory"
(p. 8). The four crucial pages of "testimony" by Elie Wiesel are
reproduced in facsimile in: Pierre Guillaume, Droit et Histoire
(La Vieille Taupe, 1986), pp. 147-150. In the German-language edition
of Night (Die Nacht zu begraben, Elischa [Ullstein, 1962]), on 14
occasions the word "crematory" or "crematories" has been falsely
given as "Gaskammer" ("gas chamber[s]"). In January of 1945, in
anticipation of a Russian takeover, the Germans were evacuating
Auschwitz. Elie Wiesel, a young teenager at the time, was hospitalized
in Birkenau (the "extermination camp") after surgery on an infected
foot. His doctor had recommended two weeks of rest and good food
but, before his foot healed, the Russian takeover became imminent.
Hospital patients were considered unfit for the long trip to the
camps in Germany and Elie thus could have remained at Birkenau to
await the Russians. Although his father had permission to stay with
him as a hospital patient or orderly, father and son talked it over
and decided to move out with the Germans. (See Night, p. 93. See
also D. Calder, The Sunday Sun [Toronto, Canada], May 31, 1987,
p. C4.)
- See the US War Refugee Board Report, German
Extermination Camps: Auschwitz and Birkenau (Washington, DC), November
1944.
- See Nuremberg document PS-3311 (USA-293). Published
in the IMT "blue series," Vol. 32, pp. 153-158.
- See the report in Pravda, Feb. 2, 1945, p. 4,
and the UP report in the Washington (DC) Daily News, Feb. 2, 1945,
p. 2.
- Night (Avon/Discus). See esp. pp. 41, 42, 43,
44, 79, 93.
- Paroles d'étranger (Editions du Seuil, 1982),
p. 86.
- "Author, Teacher, Witness," Time magazine, March
18, 1985, p. 79.
- "Le Système concentrationnaire allemand [1940-1944],"
Revue d'histoire de la Deuxième Guerre mondiale, July 1954, p. 18,
n. 2.
- Le Journal du Dimanche, March 30, 1985, p.
5.
- Libération, Jan. 24, 1986, p. 19.
- Published by Stein and Day (New York). Paperback
edition of 1984. (xii + 180 pages.) With a foreword by Yehuda Bauer
of the Institute of Contemporary Jewry, Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
- Carlo Mattogno, Auschwitz: un caso di plagio,
Parma (Italy): 1986. See also: C. Mattogno, "Auschwitz: A Case of
Plagiarism," The Journal of Historical Review, Spring 1990, pp.
5-24.
- Paperback edition, 1961, and later, published
by Fawcett Crest (New York).
- Legends of Our Time (chapter 12: "Appointment
with Hate"), New York: Schocken Books, 1982, p. 142, or, New York:
Avon, 1968, pp. 177-178.
- The Week in Germany (published in New York
by the German government in Bonn), Jan. 31, 1986, p. 2.
- "The Holocaust: Its Use and Abuse Within the
American Public," Yad Vashem Studies (Jerusalem), 1981, p. 316.
- VSD, May 29, 1986, p. 37.
- Ouest-France, August 2-3, 1986, p. 6.
Summary
Elie Wiesel passes for one of the most celebrated eyewitnesses to the
alleged Holocaust. Yet in his supposedly autobiographical book Night,
he makes no mention of gas chambers. He claims instead to have witnessed
Jews being burned alive, a story now dismissed by all historians. Wiesel
gives credence to the most absurd stories of other "eyewitnesses." He
spreads fantastic tales of 10,000 persons sent to their deaths each
day in Buchenwald.
When Elie Wiesel and his father, as Auschwitz prisoners, had the choice of
either leaving with their retreating German "executioners," or remaining
behind in the camp to await the Soviet "liberators," the two decided
to leave with their German captors.
It is time, in the name of truth and out of respect for the genuine sufferings
of the victims of the Second World War, that historians return to the
proven methods of historical criticism, and that the testimony of the
Holocaust "eyewitnesses" be subjected to rigorous scrutiny rather than
unquestioning acceptance.
Edition of: 10/93
For the current IHR catalog, with a complete listing of books and audio
and video tapes, send two dollars to:
Institute For Historical Review
Post Office Box 2739
Newport Beach, California 92659
Send all questions and comments to
webmaster@ihr.org
|
