|
THERE IS NO LIBERTY WITHOUT
FREE SPEECH AND OPEN DEBATE
"...the fanatic hides from true debate....
He knows how to speak in monologues only, so
debate is superfluous to him." (Elie Wiesel)
$250,000 Offer
Every historical controversy can be debated
on national television except one--the Jewish
holocaust story. Why? Who benefits? Open debate,
nothing else, will expose the facts behind this
taboo.
To this end Committee for Open Debate
on the Holocaust (CODOH) offers $250,000
to the one individual instrumental in arranging
a 90-minute debate on National Network Television,
in prime time, between CODOH (Bradley R. Smith,
Dir.), and the
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE (ADL)
Issues to be debated: (1) Were "gas chambers"
used during WWII by Germans to kill millions
of Jews as part of a program of "genocide?"
(2) Did key "eyewitness" survivors give false
testimony about "gas chambers?" (3) Is the
Diary of Anne Frank an authentic personal
diary or a "literary" concoction? (4) Are mainline
Jewish organizations like the ADL committed
to the censorship of revisionist theory on the
Jewish holocaust? (5) Should the ADL
and other mainline Jewish organizations respond
with a "suspicious silence" when a sister organization
encourages violence against revisionists? (6)
Should a documentary film maker be made the
target of violence by the Jewish Defense
League (or any other "league"), as was David
Cole, the Jewish writer and director of CODOH's
video on Auschwitz, David Cole Interviews Dr.
Franciszek Piper (called "The Video of the Century"),
for exposing on film the fraud of the Auschwitz
gas chamber?
Marcy Kaptur (D), U.S.Congresswoman, Ohio
writes: "Mr. Cole has obviously invested a great
deal in researching his subject and I admire
his tenacious curiosity. Again, I thank you
for sharing this documentary with myself and
other Members of Congress." Yehuda Bauer,
professor of Holocaust Studies, Hebrew University
(Tel Aviv), writes: "A powerful, dangerous
video...."
The Jewish Defense League writes (in
a "Wanted" ad for Mr. Cole, on the Internet,
which includes Cole's photograph): "An evil
monster like this does not deserve to live....
We must get rid of this monster.... There needs
to be ... the elimination of the Holocaust deniers.
JDL wants to know the location of ... David
Cole. Anyone giving us his correct address will
receive a monetary reward."
The FBI has termed the JDL a "terrorist organization."
The Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith
refuses to publicly condemn the Jewish Defense
League for this language of hate. The reason
is clear. The ADL, by proxy, is "using" this
threat of violence against a Jewish scholar
in its own struggle to help censor open debate
on the Holocaust controversy. This betrays our
First Amendment and runs contrary to Article
19 of The Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Who benefits from such censorship? Americans?
Over the past decades there have been thousands
-if not tens of thousands - of hours
of one-sided Holocaust allegations broadcast
to the American people. Is it not fair that
those of us who are not anti-German bigots,
who no longer believe the gas chamber stories
but do believe in intellectual freedom, should
be given 90 minutes -only 90 minutes!
-to debate the Anti-Defamation League over the
suppression and censorship of holocaust revisionism? (2.9/2)
If interested in earning
$250,000 you will
find details at
www.codoh.com
Offer good through 31 May, 1999
|
