Thanks for your interesting query. Only time will tell for
sure what the exact impact of the opening of the "Nazi archives"
at Arolsen will bring. With that said, AnswerMan believes
that the opening of the archives will be another
minor revisionist
victory.
Others anticipate more from Arolsen.
For instance, in Georges Theil's book, Heresy in Twenty-First
Century France, he writes:
"The information and statistics of which Arolsen disposes in
abundance are, of course, of capital significance. For
they are the ultimate key: here it will be obvious whether
a holocaust happened or did not happen."
I am less optimistic. Understand, that I believe the archives
at Arolsen will certainly
support the revisionist position. This will not be a "moment
of truth" however as the revisionist position has been proven many
times over. Arolsen will be only one more straw on the proverbial
camel's back.
Consider that original Soviet
propaganda put forth the estimate of 1.5 million Jewish deaths at
the concentration camp Majdanek. The United States
Holocaust Memorial Museum has taken an iron cast of the "gas chamber
door"
from that camp and made it the final display that one sees during
their tour. Today however, experts at the Majdanek museum
have "revised" the actual number of Jewish deaths down to 59,000.
The "gas chamber" door has been shown to be a widely used air raid
shelter door. Still, textbooks repeat extraordinary
figures for Majdanek and the USHMM does not inform its tourists
of the real function of that heavy steel door.
It is highly unlikely that the opening of the ITS files at Arolsen
will put the matter to rest. The mainstream media has portrayed
the files that way with the anticipation of finding extremely high
numbers of deaths recorded. This would then put an end to
revisionism once and for all -- or so the argument goes. However,
if the numbers are low, as I am quite sure they will be, the matter
will be swept under the rug and alternative ideas will pop up as
to what really happened and how the dastardly Germans falsified
the records to show lower numbers than what really happened.
Case
in point, by 1992, the Soviet archives in Moscow opened. These
archives held the Auschwitz "death books" (Sterbebuch). Each
book contains hundreds of death certificates. Each certificate
meticulously records numerous revealing details, including the deceased
person's full name, profession, religion, date and place of birth, time of death and cause of death.
The death registry books fell into Soviet hands in January 1945
when the Red Army captured Auschwitz. When the archive opened it
was revealed that Moscow had 46 of these volumes. They covered partially
the years 1941, 1942, and 1943. There were no volumes for
1944 or 1945. It has been suggested by the International
Red Cross that the Soviets "misplaced" the additional missing volumes.
Russian officials permitted the International Committee of
the Red Cross (ICRC) - the International Tracing Service in Arolsen,
Germany to make copies of the death certificates. There were 69,000
death certificates. Even if one extrapolates for the missing
books, the numbers do not grow to the mythic millions proportions.
Still, this information is largely neglected by the fundamentalists.
When Francizek Piper, the Director of the Auschwitz museum wrote
his article, "The Number of Victims" (published in the US in 1994),
he states, "When the Soviet soldiers liberated the camp [Auschwitz]
in January 1945, they found documents that confirmed only 100,000
deaths." Still, in light of the hard evidence, Piper suggests
that many victims were never
registered into the Auschwitz camp and rather went directly to the
gas chambers. Therefore although maybe 100,000 inmates who
were registered died at Auschwitz, some 1 million who were never
registered were murdered there. What evidence you ask is there
for the 1 million murdered? There is actually no evidence
of the murder of these people.
Piper and others have examined
train records to review how many inmates were sent to the camp.
They then looked at how many were registered and theorized that
the rest were murdered. They largely ignored the fact that
Auschwitz also served as a transit camp and that many individuals
transferred there were not registered there, because after a brief
stay (a few days to a few weeks) they were moved on to other camps
within the system. The fundamentalists have attempted
many times in the past twenty years to conclusively finish off the
revisionists. Every attempt has failed miserably. When
revisionists are proven to be correct, the facts are buried.
I expect the same from Arolsen.