|
THERE IS NO LIBERTY WITHOUT
FREE SPEECH AND OPEN DEBATE
"...the fanatic hides from true debate.... He knows how to
speak in monologues only, so debate is superfluous to him." (Elie
Wiesel)
$250,000 Offer
Every historical controversy can be debated on national television
except one--the Jewish holocaust story. Why? Who benefits? Open debate,
nothing else, will expose the facts behind this taboo.
To this end Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust (CODOH)
offers $250,000 to the one individual instrumental in arranging
a 90-minute debate on National Network Television, in prime time, between
CODOH (Bradley R. Smith, Dir.), and the
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE (ADL)
Issues to be debated: (1) Were "gas chambers" used during
WWII by Germans to kill millions of Jews as part of a program of "genocide?"
(2) Did key "eyewitness" survivors give false testimony about "gas chambers?"
(3) Is the Diary of Anne Frank an authentic personal diary or
a "literary" concoction? (4) Are mainline Jewish organizations like
the ADL committed to the censorship of revisionist theory on
the Jewish holocaust? (5) Should the ADL and other mainline Jewish
organizations respond with a "suspicious silence" when a sister organization
encourages violence against revisionists? (6) Should a documentary film
maker be made the target of violence by the Jewish Defense League
(or any other "league"), as was David Cole, the Jewish writer and director
of CODOH's video on Auschwitz, David Cole Interviews Dr. Franciszek
Piper (called "The Video of the Century"), for exposing on film the
fraud of the Auschwitz gas chamber?
Marcy Kaptur (D), U.S.Congresswoman, Ohio writes: "Mr. Cole
has obviously invested a great deal in researching his subject and I
admire his tenacious curiosity. Again, I thank you for sharing this
documentary with myself and other Members of Congress." Yehuda Bauer,
professor of Holocaust Studies, Hebrew University (Tel Aviv), writes:
"A powerful, dangerous video...."
The Jewish Defense League writes (in a "Wanted" ad for Mr.
Cole, on the Internet, which includes Cole's photograph): "An evil monster
like this does not deserve to live.... We must get rid of this monster....
There needs to be ... the elimination of the Holocaust deniers. JDL
wants to know the location of ... David Cole. Anyone giving us his correct
address will receive a monetary reward."
The FBI has termed the JDL a "terrorist organization."
The Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith refuses to publicly
condemn the Jewish Defense League for this language of hate. The reason
is clear. The ADL, by proxy, is "using" this threat of violence against
a Jewish scholar in its own struggle to help censor open debate on the
Holocaust controversy. This betrays our First Amendment and runs contrary
to Article 19 of The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Who benefits
from such censorship? Americans?
Over the past decades there have been thousands -if not tens of
thousands - of hours of one-sided Holocaust allegations broadcast
to the American people. Is it not fair that those of us who are not
anti-German bigots, who no longer believe the gas chamber stories but
do believe in intellectual freedom, should be given 90 minutes -only
90 minutes! -to debate the Anti-Defamation League over the suppression
and censorship of holocaust revisionism? (2.9/2)
If interested in earning $250,000
you will find details at
www.codoh.com
Offer good through 31 May, 1999
|